Here is a copy of the flyer distributed at the co-lab.
Latest Data
This is the latest online antisemitism data, collected through to the end of November 2025. Since October 7, 2023, the Online Hate Prevention Institute has collected over 13,400 items of antisemitism. This includes over 800 items from each of the ten platforms we have monitored.
Every item has been:
- Reported to the platform it was hosted on
- Document by our staff
- Categorised according to the 27 categories of antisemitism based on the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism
- Archived so a copy is kept even after the material is removed
The level of antisemitism
The Level of Online Antisemitism by Platform graph shows that as the ceasefire has taken hold, the level of antisemitism has started to dropped on almost every platform. Despite the drop, we remain at very elevated levels compared to before October 7, 2023 (shown in dark blue to the left of each set of graphs).
The nature of antisemitism
Our Type of Antisemitism graph shows that traditional antisemitism remains the most dominant form of antisemitism, followed by Israel related antisemitism which occurs about half as frequently. The drop in antisemitism overall is reflected in a drop across all categories, but the Israeli related category has changed the least.
The narratives of antisemitism
Each type of antisemitism is made up of multiple specific categories. To provide a more detailed look, we can examine these narratives as they appear on a specific platform. Some narratives occur much more frequently on one platform than on another. Note that as multiple narratives can appear in a single post, it is possible for the percentages to add up to more than 100%.
The Specific Antisemitism Narratives on X (Twitter) graph shows that in November there was a dominance of category 3.6 which is “Promoting traditional antisemitism such as blood libel and claims Jews killed Jesus” which appears in 44% of the antisemitism on X. Also included in this category are racial slurs (e.g. Kike), demonization (Jews are the devil), well poisoning, etc. It does not include conspiracy theories of Jewish power (such as those in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion) as they are separately listed in other 3.x categories.
The Specific Antisemitism Narratives on TikTok graphs again shows that in November category 3.6 as very common, but this time it is matched by category 4.4, each of them appearing in 20% of all content on TikTok. Category 4.4 is content which describes Israel, Israelis, or Zionists using any of the antisemitic words or imagery that would normally be covered by a “3.x” category if it was instead explicitly about Jews. This includes not only category 3.6 described above, but also the various conspiracy theories. 4.4 includes claims that “Zionists control the government”, the banks, the media, etc. There is a rise in category 4.4 on TikTok over recent months. Category 3.6 dropped in August, rose in September and October, then dropped again in November.
Unlike the previous two platforms, on LinkedIn in November category 4.4 remained the highest at 34%, followed by category 3.6 at 25%. This reflects they way some people use LinkedIn engage in advocacy targeting professional networks, and either fail to recognise when their content about Israel, Israelis, or Zionists crosses into the use of traditional antisemitic tropes, or feel it is acceptable to do this.
As an example of a far-right platform we can see the graph for Gab which shows the in November 64% of the antisemitism was in category 3.6. It also shows that 24% was in category 3.2 which is “Promoting the idea of a world Jewish conspiracy”. While it is only at 6% of the content in November, category 2.3 “Calling for harm to Jewish people in general” has been steadily growing back towards the 11% it was at before October 7. This is something to watch. As expected, the far right has far less engagement with Israel related antisemitism, though category 4.4 still gets some attention as traditional antisemitism is expressed in terms of Israel, Israelis, or Zionists, but it is far less common than on the other platforms (under 7%) and the other 4.x categories are almost completely absent.
Here is the full list of categories.
What next?
This monitoring is the result of multiple projects carried out in partnership with the ECAJ, ASECA, the Dor Foundation, and the Online Hate Task Force over the last 4 years. There are currently no projects supporting the continuation of this monitoring.
We welcome interest from partners and donors able to support this critical monitoring work – please email partners@ohpi.org.au and also accept tax-deductible donations via our website.
Our focus in the mean time will be on the webinar series we have planned and we hope you will join us for this in early 2026. We will be leveraging our connections to bring donors and community organisations in Australia access to some of the best international experts we work with from around the globe. We’ll share the successes and failures of those who have pioneered work into online antisemitism over the past two decades, and their thoughts for the challenges in an AI driven world where social media gives way to the metaverse. This series is designed to bring the boards of foundations, donors, and community leaders and senior professional staff up to speed in the rapidly changing and technology heavy world. Existing expertise in technology and social media is not required.